Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNICH
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Attività

UNI-FIND
Logo UNICH

|

UNI-FIND

unich.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Competenze
  • Attività
  1. Persone

A comparison of GABA-ergic (propofol) and non-GABA-ergic (dexmedetomidine) sedation on visual and motor cortical oscillations, using magnetoencephalography

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2021
Abstract:
Studying changes in cortical oscillations can help elucidate the mechanistic link between receptor physiology and the clinical effects of anaesthetic drugs. Propofol, a GABA-ergic drug produces divergent effects on visual cortical activity: increasing induced gamma-band responses (GBR) while decreasing evoked responses. Dexmedetomidine, an α2- adrenergic agonist, differs from GABA-ergic sedatives both mechanistically and clinically as it allows easy arousability from deep sedation with less cognitive side-effects. Here we use magnetoencephalography (MEG) to characterize and compare the effects of GABA-ergic (propofol) and non-GABA-ergic (dexmedetomidine) sedation, on visual and motor cortical oscillations. Sixteen male participants received target-controlled infusions of propofol and dexmedetomidine, producing mild-sedation, in a placebo-controlled, cross-over study. MEG data was collected during a combined visuomotor task. The key findings were that propofol significantly enhanced visual stimulus induced GBR (44% increase in amplitude) while dexmedetomidine decreased it (40%). Propofol also decreased the amplitudes of the Mv100 (visual M100) (27%) and Mv150 (52%) visual evoked fields (VEF), whilst dexmedetomidine had no effect on these. During the motor task, neither drug had any significant effect on movement related gamma synchrony (MRGS), movement related beta de-synchronisation (MRBD) or Mm100 (movement-related M100) movement-related evoked fields (MEF), although dexmedetomidine slowed the Mm300. Dexmedetomidine increased (92%) post-movement beta synchronisation/rebound (PMBR) power while propofol reduced it (70%, statistically non- significant). Overall, dexmedetomidine and propofol, at equi-sedative doses, produce contrasting effects on visual induced GBR, VEF, PMBR and MEF. These findings provide a mechanistic link between the known receptor physiology of these sedative drugs with their known clinical effects and may be used to explore mechanisms of other anaesthetic drugs on human consciousness.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Conscious sedation; Dexmedetomidine; Magnetoencephalography; Neurophysiology; Oscillations; Propofol
Elenco autori:
Saxena, N.; Muthukumaraswamy, S. D.; Richmond, L.; Babic, A.; Singh, K. D.; Hall, J. E.; Wise, R. G.; Shaw, A. D.
Autori di Ateneo:
WISE RICHARD GEOFFREY
Link alla scheda completa:
https://ricerca.unich.it/handle/11564/769471
Link al Full Text:
https://ricerca.unich.it//retrieve/handle/11564/769471/295485/1-s2.0-S1053811921009320-main.pdf
https://ricerca.unich.it//retrieve/handle/11564/769471/295486/1-s2.0-S1053811921009320-mmc1.docx
Pubblicato in:
NEUROIMAGE
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921009320
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 25.4.2.0