Data di Pubblicazione:
2021
Abstract:
The present paper focuses on four key-concepts of Alf Ross’s opus
magnum: the normative ideology, the prediction of judicial behaviour,
the sources of law, the legal reasoning. In the wake of some criticism
raised by Stig Jørgensen and Preben Stuer Lauridsen it follows the conclusion that Ross, by adhering to the main tenets of Logical positivism
and so emphasizing that the juridical argumentation is nothing but a
façade legitimation aimed at supporting belief in the objectivity of the
decision, precludes himself from the worthwhile possibility of constructing a theory of legal argumentation.
magnum: the normative ideology, the prediction of judicial behaviour,
the sources of law, the legal reasoning. In the wake of some criticism
raised by Stig Jørgensen and Preben Stuer Lauridsen it follows the conclusion that Ross, by adhering to the main tenets of Logical positivism
and so emphasizing that the juridical argumentation is nothing but a
façade legitimation aimed at supporting belief in the objectivity of the
decision, precludes himself from the worthwhile possibility of constructing a theory of legal argumentation.
Tipologia CRIS:
2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio)
Elenco autori:
Serpe, Alessandro
Link alla scheda completa:
Link al Full Text:
Titolo del libro:
STUDIES ON ARGUMENTATION & LEGAL PHILOSOPHY / 4 RAGIONI ED EMOZIONI NELLA DECISIONE GIUDIZIALE