PB032 - NEUROSCIENCE OF MENTAL DISORDERS

The test will be carried out by oral questions and interview, possibly supplemented by a multimedia teaching demonstration.
Evaluation grid:
30 cum laude: in-depth knowledge of the contents of the bibliography and lessons combined with a critical language not only precise and congruous but already inclined to the best teaching effectiveness
28-30: in-depth knowledge of the bibliography and of the content of the lessons expressed through an exact and congruous critical language and of appreciable argumentative clarity.
24-27: Good knowledge of the bibliography and the content of the lessons. Critical language with some inaccuracies and not always congruous to the object, presence of excessive simplifications in the exposure.
18-23: Sometimes uncertain knowledge of the contents of the bibliography and lessons. Critical language in which generalizations and inconsistencies are present. Presence of simplifications partially inadequate to the content of the exhibition.
Invitation to repeat the test:
Serious gaps in the preparation both concerning the texts in the bibliography and the subject of the lessons.
For attending students, an alternative assessment method is available, consisting of three in-progress evaluations. The first is a multiple-choice questionnaire designed to assess the acquisition of basic knowledge. The second consists of open-ended questions and aims to evaluate the ability to organize and articulate knowledge in a structured, discursive manner. The third is an oral presentation on a topic of the student's choice, intended to assess critical thinking skills and the quality of the presentation, including the appropriate use of subject-specific terminology. Each component is graded on a scale of 30, and the final grade is the arithmetic average of the three scores.