Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNICH
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze

UNI-FIND
Logo UNICH

|

UNI-FIND

unich.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  • Terza Missione
  • Attività
  • Competenze
  1. Pubblicazioni

Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2017
Abstract:
Objective: Advances in prenatal imaging techniques have led to an increase in the diagnosis of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). However, antenatal counseling when CSP is diagnosed is challenging, and current evidence is derived mainly from small series reporting high rates of adverse maternal outcomes. The aim of this study was to ascertain the performance of prenatal ultrasound in predicting the natural history of CSP using a new sonographic sign, the crossover sign (COS). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of early first-trimester (6–8 weeks' gestation) ultrasound images in women with morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) managed in the third trimester of pregnancy. The relationship between the gestational sac of the CSP, anterior uterine wall and Cesarean scar, defined as the COS, was analyzed to determine whether it could predict evolution in these cases. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between different types of COS (COS-1, COS-2+ or COS-2–) and the occurrence of MAP. Results: Sixty-eight pregnancies with MAP were included. The risk of placenta percreta was significantly higher in pregnancies with COS-1 than in those with COS-2 (OR, 6.67 (95% CI, 1.3–33.3)). When evaluating the two variants of COS-2 separately, the risk of placenta percreta was significantly higher in pregnancies with COS-1 vs COS-2+ (OR, 5.83 (95% CI, 1.1–30.2)) and this risk was even higher when comparing cases with COS-1 vs COS-2– (OR, 12.0 (95% CI, 1.9–75.7)). Logistic regression analysis showed that COS-1 was associated independently with severe forms of MAP, such as placenta percreta and increta (OR, 12.85 (95% CI, 2.0–84.0)), while COS-2+ was associated independently with placenta accreta (OR, 4.37 (95% CI, 1.1–17.0)). Conclusions: Ultrasound assessment of the relationship between the gestational sac of a CSP and the endometrial line (the COS) may help to determine whether a CSP will progress towards a less severe form of MAP, amenable to postnatal treatment, and successful pregnancy outcome. Large prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and elucidate the natural history of this condition. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Cesarean scar pregnancy; morbidly adherent placenta; ultrasound; Adult; Cesarean Section; Cicatrix; Female; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Elenco autori:
Cali, G.; Forlani, F.; Timor-Tritsch, I. E.; Palacios-Jaraquemada, J.; Minneci, G.; D'Antonio, F.
Autori di Ateneo:
D'ANTONIO FRANCESCO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://ricerca.unich.it/handle/11564/743158
Pubblicato in:
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.16216
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0